Articles · Vol. 14 No. 1 (2016): Journal of Higher Education in Africa

Access to, and Success in, Higher Education in Post-apartheid South Africa: Social Justice Analysis

Vol. 14 · 2016 No. 1 Journal of Higher Education in Africa JHEA

Abstract

The post-apartheid government that came to power in 1994 inherited an inequitable and unjust higher education system whose expression included preferential access to higher education for whites and limited higher educa- tion opportunities for the black majority. As a result, one of the priorities of the new government was to redress the inequalities of apartheid by adopting policies that would widen access to higher education for all South Africans and, simultaneously, ensure their success. This article analyses the progress made in the implementation of equity policies by posing the following ques- tion: ‘What progress has been made in the pursuit of a policy of equity of access and of success since 1997?’ We have examined government-related documents and institutional practices to answer this question. We link ac- cess with success to explain the impact of the transformation agenda on the outcomes of higher education. Using social inclusion and justice theory, we contest neoliberal ideologies of access (Gidlye et al. 2010) as merely increasing participation rates and relying on the economic role of higher education, without paying attention to the factors that should facilitate success in higher education. Methodologically, the paper relies on the documentary analysis of secondary data, on social theory, and on primary data obtained from official government policies and reports.

Keywords

post-apartheid government education system apartheid social inclusion neoliberal ideologies justice

Statistics

Abstract views
1,968
Downloads
318

Citations

Citations counted by OpenAlex, an open index of scholarly literature, updated weekly. Google Scholar may count more.

Author Biographies

  • Kolawole Samuel Adeyemo

    Senior Lecturer in the Department of Education Management and Policy Studies, University of Pretoria.

  • Chika Sehoole

    Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Education Management and Policy Studies, University of Pretoria.

References

  1. Adelzadeh, A., 1996, ‘From RDP to GEAR: the gradual embracing of neo-liberalism in economic policy’, Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 31.
  2. Badat, S., 2009, On Differentiation and Diversity. Assessed 13 October 2013 from http://www.cepd.org.za/files/pictures/OnDifferentation -13oct2009.pdf
  3. Boughey, C., 2012, ‘Social inclusion and exclusion in a changing higher education environment’, Alberta Journal of Education Research 2 (2): 133–51.
  4. Cele, N. and Brandt, C., 2005, Extending Access and Exclusive Provision in Distance Higher Education. Available at: http://www.col.org/pcf2/papers%5Cele.pdf.
  5. Council on Higher Education (CHE), 2004, South African Higher Education in the First Decade of Democracy, Pretoria: CHE.
  6. Council on Higher Education (CHE), 2010, Higher Education Monitor 10: Teaching and Learning and Beyond Formal Access, Pretoria: CHE.
  7. Council on Higher Education (CHE), 2013, Vital Statics: Public Higher Education 2011, Pretoria: CHE.
  8. Department of Education (DoE), 1997, Education White Paper 3: A Programme forTransformation of Higher Education. General Notice 1196 of 1997, Pretoria.
  9. Fraser, W. and Killen, R., 2005, ‘The perception of students and lecturers of some factors influencing academic performance at two South Africa universities’ Perspective in Education 23 (1): 25–40.
  10. Gidlye, J.M., Hampson, G.P., Wheeler, L. and Bereded-Samuel, E., 2010, ‘From access to success: an integrated approach to quality in higher education informed by social inclusion theory and practice’, Higher Education Policy 23 (1): 123–47.
  11. Giroux, H.A., 2003, ‘Selling out higher education’, Policy Futures in Education 1: 179–200.
  12. Howie, S.J., 2003, ‘Language and other background factors affecting secondary pupils’ performance in mathematics in South Africa’, African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 7: 1–20.
  13. Howie. S.J., 2006, ‘Multi-level Factors Affecting the Performance of South African Pupils in Mathematics’, in Howie, S.J. and Plomp, T., eds, Contexts of Learning and Science, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  14. International Association of Universities (IAU), 2008, Equitable Access, Success, and Quality in Higher Education: A Policy Statement by International Association of Universities, Paris: International Association of Universities.
  15. Knight, J., 2009, Introduction: Financing Access and Equity in Higher Education.SensePublishers, Vol. 17.
  16. Nunan, T., George, R. and McCausland H., 2005, ‘Inclusive Education in Universities: Why it is Important and How it Might be Achieved’, in K.J. Topping and S. Malony, eds, The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Inclusive Education, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  17. MacGregor, S., 1999, ‘Welfare, neo-liberalism and new paternalism: three ways for social policy in late capitalist societies’, Capital & Class 23 (1): 91–117.
  18. MacGregor, K., 2013, ‘More university inequality = more academy inequality’,University World News 290, 5 October.
  19. Morrow, W., 1993, ‘Epistemological access in the university’, AD Issues 1 (1), 3–5.
  20. Payas, J., 2011, ‘Crisis in mathematics education. Student failure: challenges and possibilities’, South Africa Journal of Higher Education 15 (3): 66–73.
  21. Rawal, N., 2008, ‘Social inclusion and exclusion: a review’, Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 2.
  22. Republic of South Africa (RSA) and Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), 2010, University State Budget, Pretoria: DHET.
  23. Republic of South Africa (RSA) Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), 2012, University State Budget, Pretoria: DHET.
  24. Staden E.V., 2013, The Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) Approach to Improving Access with Success. Student Access and Success Conference ‘Re-visioning the Student Success Eco-systems in South African Higher Education’, 22–24 January.
  25. Sehalapelo, H., 2013, Student Readiness and Success Initiatives. Student Access and Success Conference ‘Re-visioning the Student Success Eco-systems in South African Higher Education’, 22–24 January 2013.
  26. Sehoole, C., 2005, Democratising Higher Education Policy: Constraints of Reform in Post-apartheid South Africa, New York: Routledge.
  27. Sehoole C. and Phatlane R., 2013, Governance Reforms in Higher Education in South Africa Higher Education Steering Mechanism, IIEP–UNESCO report.
  28. Tinto, V., 1975, ‘Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research’, Review of Educational Research 45 (1): 89–125.
  29. Tait M., Van Eeden S. and Tart, M., 2002, ‘An exploratory study on perceptions of previously educationally disadvantaged first-year learners of law regarding university education’, Journal of College Student Personnel 28 (3): 261–66.
  30. Tonks, D. and Farr, M., 2003, ‘Widening access and participation in UK higher education’, International Journal of Educational Management 17 (1): 26–36.
  31. White Paper 3., 1997, A Programme for Higher Education Transformation, STAATS- KOERANT, 15 August (No 182073).
  32. Wilson-Strydom, M., 2011, ‘University access for social justice: a capabilities perspective’, South African Journal of Education 31: 407–18.
  33. Wood, T., 1998, ‘Issue relating to the cognitive development of student at histori- cally disadvantaged institutions’, South Africa Journal of Higher Education12 (1): 87–94.