Articles · Vol. 33 No. 2 (2008): Africa Development
Poverty Eradication Dilemma: Understanding Poverty Dynamics in Nebbi District, Uganda
- DOI https://doi.org/10.4314/ad.v33i2.57289
- Published 2021-10-05
Abstract
This paper addresses a current methodological gap in poverty measurement, which stems from acknowledging the multi-dimensionality of poverty, on the one hand, and using an income/consumption measurement of poverty as the norm, on the other. The current income-based measure of poverty presents only part of measuring poverty status as a whole. The consumption basket is wrongly taken by those of economic inclination to wholly represent the entire, even non- monetary valued, range of poverty. The paper approaches this dilemma using a participatory and community-driven approach where the subjective views of people are used to define and categorize the poor, contrary to the poverty line approach. Such categorization was based on the perceived wellness of life and what made/denied wellness. A survey follows to explore the quantitative scope of poverty. This participatory, qualitative and quantitative mix of method, it is argued, provides for ascertaining organizational accountability in terms of the relevance of programme targeting and outreach as well as performance measurement over time. The method can also be used to deepen current participatory poverty assessments that simply stop at defining and identifying poverty causes, effects and solutions.
Keywords
poverty Agency for Accelerated Regional Development (AFARD) Nebbi District Uganda
Statistics
- Abstract views
- 3,035
- Downloads
- 79
Citations
1 citation
Citations counted by OpenAlex, an open index of scholarly literature, updated weekly. Google Scholar may count more.
References
- AFARD, 2006, AFARD Strategic Direction 2007–11: Deepening and widening impacts. Nebbi: AFARD.
- Agarwal, B., 1994, A Field of One’s Own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Agarwal, B., 1997, ‘‘Bargaining’ and gender relations: Within and beyond the household’, Feminist Economics 1(1): 1–51.
- Appleton, S., 1995, The Rich are Just Like Us Only Richer: Poverty functions or consumption functions? WPS/95-4. Centre for the Study of African Economies, Oxford (March).
- Appleton, S., 1999, Changes in Poverty and Inequality in Uganda, 1992–1997. Kampala: MoFPED.
- Appleton, S., 2001, Poverty Dynamics During Growth: The case of Uganda, 1999– 2000. Mimeo. School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Chronic Poverty Research Centre in Uganda, 2005, Chronic Poverty in Uganda: The policy challenges. Kampala: DRT.
- District Planning Unit, 2006, Nebbi District Local Government 3-Year Development Plan for FY 2006/07–2008/08. Nebbi: District Planning Unit (June).
- Kanbur, R. and Squire, L., 1999, The Evolution of Thinking About Poverty: Exploring the interaction. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
- Lakwo, A., 2006, Microfinance, Rural Livelihoods and Women’s Empowerment in Uganda. Leiden: African Studies Centre.
- MoFPED, 2001, Uganda Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Progress Report 2001: Summary of Poverty Status Report. Kampala: MoFPED (8 February).
- MoFPED, 2002, Second Participatory Poverty Assessment Report: Deepening the understanding of poverty. Kampala (December).
- MoFPED, 2004, Poverty Eradication Action Plan, 2004/05–2007/08. Kampala. MoFPED, 2005, Poverty Status Report, 2005: Progress in implementing PEAP. Kampala.
- MoFPED, n.d., Uganda Poverty Status Report, 2003: Achievements and pointers for the PEAP Revision. Kampala.
- Nebbi District Local Government, 2002, Participatory Poverty Assessment for (i) Parombo Sub-county; (ii) Pakwach Town Council; (iii) Nebbi Town Council; and (iv) Zeu Sub-county. CEFORD.
- Scott, J., 1998, Seeing Like a State: Why certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- UNDP, 1997, The Human Development Report: Human Development to Eradicate Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press
- World Bank, 2000, World Development Report 2000/01: Attacking Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
In this issue
Vol. 33 No. 2 (2008): Africa Development →- Democratization of Science and Biotechnological Development: Public Debate on GM Maize in South Africa Mwale
- Community Development: A Cross-Examination of Theory and Practice Using Experiences in Rural Malawi Jimu
- Globalization and State–Society Relations in Africa Mengisteab
- Traditional Authority at the Crossroads of Governance in Republican Cameroon Cheka