Accès libre Évalué par les pairs

Articles · Vol. 8 No 1 (2010): Revue de l’enseignement supérieur en Afrique · Pages 123-139

The Relationship Between Vice-Chancellors’ Leadership Behaviour and the Work Behaviour of Lecturers in Nigerian Universities: Implication for Leadership Training for Vice-Chancellors

Vol. 8 · 2010 N°1 Revue de l’enseignement supérieur en Afrique JHEA

Résumé

Cette étude analyse la relation entre le mode d’administration des recteurs et l’attitude au travail des enseignants dans les universités au sud-ouest du Nigéria. En faisant usage de la technique de recherche corrélationnelle, d’un échantillonnage stratifié et de deux sortes de questionnaires pour la collecte des données, douze parmi les vingt sept universités de la zone géopolitique du sud-ouest ont été sélectionnées pour cette étude. L’attitude au travail des enseignants a été mesurée par rapport à leur niveau de participation dans l’administration de l’université, leur coopération, leur engagement et leur conformité. La perception qu’on les enseignants de l’influence du mode d’administration des recteurs sur leur attitude au travail a été évaluée ; ce qui révèle des degrés d’association à plusieurs niveaux entre les deux. Pour une meilleure efficacité et une plus grande efficience du système universitaire, cette étude propose l’instauration d’une culture de coopération au haut niveau, de l’engagement, de participation et de conformité des enseignants à travers un programme de formation de leadership pour les recteurs.

The Relationship Between Vice-Chancellors’ Leadership Behaviour and the Work Behaviour of Lecturers in Nigerian Universities: Implication for Leadership Training for Vice-Chancellors

The study examined the relationship between the leadership behaviour of Vice-Chancellors and the work behaviour of lecturers in the universities of South-West Nigeria. The study employed the correlational research design. Twelve out of the 27 universities in the South-West geo-political zone were selected as the study sample, using the stratified sampling technique. Two sets of questionnaires were adapted and used for data collection. The in- struments contain items relating to the leadership behaviour of Vice-Chan- cellors and the work behaviour of lecturers. The second was measured in terms of level of participation in university administration, cooperation, com- mitment and conformity. Lecturers’ perception of the influence of Vice-Chan- cellors’ leadership behaviour on their work behaviour was assessed on a rating scale ranging from 1 to 4. Four null hypotheses were posited and tested using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation. The test revealed varying degrees of association between Vice-Chancellors’ leadership behaviour and lecturers’ work behaviour. Recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the university system aimed at the development of a culture of high level cooperation, commitment, participation and conformity of lecturers included a proposed leadership training programme for Vice-Chancellors. To facilitate the proposed training programme, sensi- tivity training, T-groups, in-baskets, case studies, business games behaviour modelling and action learning techniques are particularly recommended

Mots-clés

Relation

Statistiques

Consultations du résumé
866
Téléchargements
151

Citations

4 citations

Voir les publications qui le citent Google Scholar

Citations recensées par OpenAlex, base ouverte de la littérature scientifique, mise à jour chaque semaine. Google Scholar peut en compter davantage.

Références

  1. Adegbite, J.G.O., 2007, Administering and Managing Universities, Ibadan: Mosuro Publishers, p. 65.
  2. Aguba, C.R., 2005, ‘Job Satisfaction among Secondary School Teachers in Public and Private Schools’, Nigerian Journal of Educational Administration and Planning, 5 (1), 224 - 228.
  3. Ajayi, O.A., 1991, ‘Leadership Style in Institutions of Higher Education: A Contingency Approach Management in Nigeria’, Journal of Institute of Management, Vol. 4, (2), p. 11.
  4. Ajayi, K., 2005, ‘Leadership, Motivation, Teamwork and Information Management for Organisational Efficiency’, Nigerian Journal of the Social Sciences, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 20-31.
  5. Alfred, C.D., 2001, ‘The Relationship between Teacher Morale and the Principal’s Administrative Leadership Style’, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 41, No. 10, p. 4218.
  6. Borishade, B. and Okebukola, P., 2006, Repositioning Higher Education in Nigeria, Nigeria: Heinemann Educational Books PLC, pp. 66-82.
  7. Ezewu, E.E., 1985, Sociology of Education, London: Longman, p. 97.
  8. Farnham, D., 1999, Managing Academic Staff in Changing University System: International Trends and Comparisons, London: SRHE and Open University Press, pp. 52-66.
  9. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004, National Policy on Education, Lagos: Federal Government Press, p. 8.
  10. Getzels, G., 1998, ‘Social Behaviour and the Administrative Process’, School Review, Vol. 65, pp. 423-441.
  11. Gross, N. and Herriot, R.E., 1965, Staff Leadership in Public Schools, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 23-34.
  12. Homans, G.C., 1990, The Human Group, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., p. 108.
  13. Inyang, B.J., 2001, ‘Productivity and Quality Improvement Strategies for Enhancing Corporate Survival in a Competition-Driven Economy’, African Journal of Business and Economic Research, Vol. 2. Nos. 1& 2, pp. 10-23.
  14. Jaffe, D., 2001, Organization Theory: Tension and Change, New York: McGraw- Hill, pp. 55-72.
  15. Kerlinger, F. N., 1975, Foundations of Behavioural Research, Harper and Row Publishers, p. 379.
  16. King, B., 2001, ‘Managing the Changing Nature of Distance and Open Education at the Institutional Level’, Open Learning, 16 (1), pp. 47-60.
  17. Letuka, L.J., 2007, ‘Equitable Access and Quality Assurance and Management: Hard Choice Phrases’, in Babalola, J. B., and Emunemu, B.O., eds., Issues in Higher Education: Research Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, Lagos: Bolabay Publications, pp.111-118.
  18. Moyer, D.C., 2001, ‘Teachers’Attitudes toward Leadership as they Relate to Teachers’ Satisfaction’, Doctoral Thesis, Chicago, University of Chicago, Reported in Getzel, et al., p. 306.
  19. Nwankwo, J. I., 1984, Introduction to Research Operations in Education and the Social Sciences, Ibadan: University of Ibadan Press Ltd, pp. 12-26.
  20. Ogunbola, A.A., 1999, ‘Human Relations in Educational Administration’, West African Journal of Education, Vol. 17, (3), pp. 365-370.
  21. Okebukola, P.A.O., 2006, State of University Education in Nigeria, Ibadan: Heinemann, pp. 21-24.
  22. Ojo, O., 2009, ‘Impact Assessment of Corporate Culture on Employees’ Job Performance’, Business Intelligence Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 388-397.
  23. Oni, A.A., 2009, ‘Effects of Socio-economic Factors on Females’ Educational Aspiration and Career Development in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria’, Benin Journal of Education, Vol. 19, Nos. 1 & 2, pp. 265-275.
  24. Peterson, E., 1992, Business Organization and Management, Illinois: Chicago Press, 5th Ed., p. 17.
  25. Shoyole, A.E., 1998, ‘Effect of Organizational Climate on Teachers’Attitude to Work in Oyo South Local Government Area’, M.Ed. Dissertation, University of Ibadan, p. 1.
  26. Stone, V., 1990, ‘Principal Leadership Style, Situational Control and School Effectiveness’, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 40, (8), pp. 43-43.
  27. Strati, A., 2000, Theory and Method in Organization Studies, London: Sage Publications, p.15.
  28. Williams, C.R., 1993, Administering the Elementary School, New York: Prentice Hall, pp. 303-335.
  29. Williams, C.V., 2001, ‘The Relationship of Leader Behaviour of the Principal to School Climate’, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 47, (10), 42-49.

Dans le même numéro

Vol. 8 No 1 (2010): Revue de l’enseignement supérieur en Afrique →