Articles · Vol. 26 No 1 (2022): Revue africaine de sociologie

Household welfare perspective of family planning utilization in Uganda

Vol. 26 · 2022 N°1 Revue africaine de sociologie ASR

Résumé

La justification de l’utilisation de la PF a changé au fil du temps pour mettre progressivement l’accent sur la réduction de la pauvreté et l’amélioration du bien-être. Cependant, la littérature n'a pas largement correspondu à ce changement. Cette étude a donc cherché à contribuer à ce manque de connaissances en explorant l’impact de la PF sur le bien-être des ménages en utilisant la consommation par équivalent adulte comme mesure du bien-être des ménages. Les données des vagues 2018/19 et 2019/20 de l’Enquête nationale par panel de l’Ouganda ont été utilisées, et l’analyse a été effectuée à l’aide des moindres carrés ordinaires regroupés. Les  résultats ont révélé que moins de ménages dirigés par des hommes et plus de femmes n’utilisant pas la PF étaient pauvres par rapport à leurs homologues. Les résultats ont également indiqué que l’utilisation de la PF augmentait le bien-être des ménages de 6,4 % parmi tous les ménages. Cette augmentation est cependant plus importante pour les femmes rurales. Les résultats indiquent ainsi le potentiel de l’utilisation de la PF pour combler le fossé rural-urbain.

Household welfare perspective of family planning utilization in Uganda

The rationale for FP use has changed over time to progressively emphasize poverty reduction and welfare improvements. However, literature hasn’t largely matched this change. This study, therefore, sought to contribute to this knowledge gap by exploring the impact of FP on household welfare using consumption per adult equivalent as the measure of household welfare. Data from the Uganda National Panel Survey 2018/19 and 2019/20 waves was used, and the analysis was done using pooled ordinary least squares. Results revealed that fewer male headed households and more of the women not using FP were poor as compared to their counterparts. Results also indicated FP use to increase household welfare by 6.4% among all households. This increase is however more significant for rural women. The results thus indicate the potential of using FP to bridge the rural-urban divide.

Statistiques

Consultations du résumé
293
Téléchargements
153

Citations

2 citations

Voir les publications qui le citent Google Scholar

Citations recensées par OpenAlex, base ouverte de la littérature scientifique, mise à jour chaque semaine. Google Scholar peut en compter davantage.

Notices biographiques

  • Phionah Namuliira

    University of Dar es Salaam School of Economics, Box 35045.

  • Razack B. Lokina

    University of Dar es Salaam School of Economics, Box 35045.

  • Innocent Pantaleo

    University of Dar es Salaam School of Economics, Box 35045.

Références

  1. Achida, M. B., Garba, T., & Abdullahi, Y. Z. (2018). Does Social Capital Determine Household Welfare? An Investigation into the Situation in Sokoto Metropolis. American Journal of Economics,8(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.5923/j. economics.20180802.04 Akerele, D., & Adewuyi, S. A. (2011). Analysis of Poverty Profiles and Socioeconomic Determinants of Welfare among Urban Households of Ekiti State, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–7.
  2. Anyanwu, J. C. (2014). Marital Status , Household Size and Poverty in Nigeria : Evidence from the 2009 / 2010 Survey Data. African Development Review, 26(1), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12069
  3. Appleton, S. (2001). Education, Incomes and Poerty in Uganda in the 1990s (No. 01/22). CREDIT Research Paper No. 01/22. The University of Nottingham, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT), https://hdl.handle.net/10419/81770
  4. Asiimwe, J. B., & Mpuga, P. (2007). Implications of rainfall shocks for household income and consumption in Uganda. AERC Research Paper No. 168). Nairobi, Kenya: African Economic Research Consortium. https://media.africaportal.org/ documents/RP_168pdf
  5. Babiarz, K. S., Lee, J., Miller, G., Peng, T. N., & Valente, C. (2017). Family Planning and Women’s Economic Empowerment: Incentive Effects and Direct Effects Among Malaysian Women. SSRN Electronic Journal, December 2017. https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125137
  6. Bailey, M. J., Malkova, O., & Mclaren, Z. M. (2017). Does parents’ access to family planning increase children’s opportunities? Evidence from the war on poverty and the early years of title x (No. w23971). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23971
  7. Bailey, M. J., Malkova, O., & Norling, J. (2014). Do family planning programs decrease poverty?Evidence from public census data. CESifo Economic Studies, 60(2), 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifu011
  8. Biyase, M., & Zwane, T. (2018). An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Poverty and Household Welfare in South Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 52(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2018.0008
  9. Booker, C. L., Andrews, L., Green, G., & Kumari, M. (2020). Impacts of long- standing illness and chronic illness on working hours and household income in a longitudinal UK study. SSM - Population Health, 12, 100684. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100684
  10. Fiala, N., & He, X. (2016). Unitary or noncooperative intrahousehold model? Evidence from couples in Uganda. World Bank Economic Review, 30(April 2016), S77– S85. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw011
  11. Frempongy, R. B., & Stadelmann, D. (2017). Does Female Education have a Bargaining Effect on Household Welfare? Evidence from Ghana and Uganda. (CREMA Working Paper, No.2017-08). Center for Research in economics, Management and the Arts. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214601.
  12. Glasier, A., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Schmid, G. P., Moreno, C. G., & Van Look, P. F. (2006). Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. Lancet, 368(9547), 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69478-6
  13. Gounder, N. (2012). The Determinants of Household Consumption and Poverty in Fiji. Griffith University. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/390456.
  14. Guloba, M. (2014). Analysis of adaptation to climate variability and change in uganda : a gender and household analysis of adaptation to climate variability and change in uganda.[Doctoral thesis,University of Dar es Salaam].https://www.efdinitiative.es/publications/phd._thesis_madina_guloba_2014.pdf
  15. Tibaijuka, L., Odongo, R., Welikhe, E., Mukisa, W., Kugonza, L., Busingye, I., Nabukalu, P., Ngonzi, J., Asiimwe, S. B., & Bajunirwe, F. (2017). Factors influencing use of long-acting versus short-acting contraceptive methods among reproductive- age women in a resource-limited setting. BMC Women’s Health, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0382-2
  16. Uganda Bureau Of Statistics. (2020a). 2020 Statistical Abstract. In Uganda Bureau of Statistics Vol. 1. http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/ pdfdocuments/ abstracts/StatisticalAbstract2020.pdf
  17. Uganda Bureau Of Statistics. (2020b, June). Uganda National Panel Survey 2018/19. Wave VII Report.
  18. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/11_202110_2021UNPS_Report_wave7_report.pdf
  19. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Uganda National Household Survey 2016/2017. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/03_2018201 6_unhs_final_report.pdf
  20. Uganda Bureau Of Statistics. & ICF. (2018). Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016. UBOS & ICF.https://dhsprogram.com/pubs /pdf/FR333/FR333.pdf
  21. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2020). World Fertility and Family Planning 2020: Highlights (ST/ESA/ SER.A/440). UNDESA https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210043694
  22. United Nations Population Fund. (2017b, March). Uganda Population Dynamics. Population Matters, 43(1), 1–4. UNFPA. https://uganda.unfpa.org/sites/ default/files/pub-pdf/Issue%20brief%201%20%20population%20 dynamics.%20Final.%2010.5.2017.pdf
  23. World Health Organization. (2020). Family planning / Contraception methods. WHO Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-ng-contraception

Dans le même numéro

Vol. 26 No 1 (2022): Revue africaine de sociologie →